Technology & security risk report
SecureScope
A public-source technology and security risk baseline
Security questionnaires and vendor reviews ask what a counterparty's technology risk actually looks like — but the public evidence is scattered across filings, disclosures, and breach records, and nobody has time to assemble it.
Prefer an invoice? Request one below. Payment methods are listed with the price at the bottom of this page.
Public-source scan
Filings, disclosures, technical records, and enforcement history. Strictly passive — no testing or scanning.
Framework benchmark
Each observation maps to the control family it concerns.
Report delivered
Prioritized findings based on available public evidence, with severity, sources, and remediation paths. 5 business days.
Representative output
IllustrativeThird-party platform concentration — Galileo processing dependency
- Evidence status
- Confirmed — 10-K risk factors; disclosed ~23% platform-account decline
- Affected obligation
- NIST CSF 2.0 (ID.SC) · Operational resilience
Recommended action
Map fourth-party dependencies, require SOC 2 Type II, and document an exit / failover plan.
Select a framework to see what SecureScope examines against it from public evidence.
Restated from the public sample profile (SoFi Technologies — a public company, not a client). Your report reflects your own entity.
Who this is for
- Security, risk, and vendor-management teams vetting a U.S. financial institution
- Institutions that want an outside-in read of their own security posture before someone else takes one
When it lands on your desk
- A vendor or counterparty review needs a defensible security baseline fast
- A partner, client, or board asked for an independent read on technology risk
- You want to see your own institution the way a diligence team would
The work
What SecureScope does
- Scores technology and security risk from public evidence — availability, resilience, access, and breach exposure
- Benchmarks observations against NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and DORA
- Delivers prioritized risk findings with remediation paths and suggested owners
- Records what public sources could not establish as explicit evidence gaps
What you provide
- The institution's name and website
- Nothing else — SecureScope is outside-in and uses no client documents
How the work is done
- Entirely public-source: filings, disclosures, technical records, and enforcement history.
- Framework-cited: each observation maps to the control family it concerns.
- Every finding carries its evidence state; gaps are reported as gaps, not guesses.
Benchmarked against
- NIST CSF 2.0
- ISO 27001
- SOC 2
- DORA
Named standards and registers this product works from. Not a certification, attestation, or endorsement of any institution.
Deliverables
What you receive
- Technology & security risk report with scored posture observations
- Prioritized findings based on available public evidence, with severity, sources, and remediation paths
- Framework benchmark against NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and DORA
- Evidence-gap register for follow-up verification
Typical timing
Delivered in 5 business days. Flat fee, self-serve intake.
Benchmarked against
| Observation type | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 | DORA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Availability | Benchmarked against NIST CSF 2.0 | Benchmarked against ISO 27001 | Benchmarked against SOC 2 | Benchmarked against DORA |
| Resilience | Benchmarked against NIST CSF 2.0 | Benchmarked against ISO 27001 | Benchmarked against SOC 2 | Benchmarked against DORA |
| Access | Benchmarked against NIST CSF 2.0 | Benchmarked against ISO 27001 | Benchmarked against SOC 2 | Benchmarked against DORA |
| Breach exposure | Benchmarked against NIST CSF 2.0 | Benchmarked against ISO 27001 | Benchmarked against SOC 2 | Benchmarked against DORA |
NIST CSF 2.0
- Availability
- Resilience
- Access
- Breach exposure
ISO 27001
- Availability
- Resilience
- Access
- Breach exposure
SOC 2
- Availability
- Resilience
- Access
- Breach exposure
DORA
- Availability
- Resilience
- Access
- Breach exposure
Every observation type is benchmarked against all four standards. A benchmark is a comparison, not a certification or attestation.
Questions
SecureScope FAQ
Do you test or scan the target's systems?
No. SecureScope is strictly passive and public-source. It involves no penetration testing, scanning, or interaction with the subject's infrastructure.
Can we run it on an institution we don't control?
Yes — it uses only public information, so it works on any U.S. financial institution, including counterparties and vendors.
How is this different from a SOC 2 report?
A SOC 2 report is an auditor's attestation over an organization's own controls. SecureScope is an independent outside-in baseline built from public evidence — useful before, or in the absence of, an attestation. It does not replace one.
When is the fee final?
All sales are final once the report is generated. Payment methods are listed with the price at the bottom of this page.
What SecureScope is not
- Not a penetration test, vulnerability scan, or any form of active technical testing.
- Not a security certification, and not assurance over the subject's controls.
- An outside-in baseline — internal controls may be stronger or weaker than public evidence shows.
- Not legal, regulatory, audit, or compliance advice — your institution remains responsible for its own regulatory obligations.
- Not an audit, audit opinion, control attestation, or certification of any kind.