Let's Work Together
Ready to build something rigorous?
Whether you want a preliminary profile, have a question about scope, or just want to connect — send a note below.
Founder & Builder — RuleboardAI
Ashwin Tatikola
Finance and technology professional. 8+ years across fund valuation, regulatory reporting, and investment operations. Founder of RuleboardAI — regulatory risk intelligence for banks, fintechs, lenders, and the teams that diligence them.
What happens next
Submit information
A few inputs — no documents needed
We review
Public-source classification & scoring
Receive your profile
Preliminary profile in ten business days
Sample deliverable
What your preliminary profile looks like
Composite maturity
2.8 / 5.0
Defined
Illustrative target — not a promised outcome
3.9 / 5.0
What this number means
Each GRC category is scored from 1 to 5: Initial, Developing, Defined, Managed, Optimized. The composite is the average of the category scores, shown to one decimal.
The word beside it is the nearest whole level. A score of 2.8 is closest to 3, so it reads Defined.
Scores come from public sources only. A low score usually means the evidence is not visible from outside, not that a control is absent.
The target is the average of what each category could realistically reach for an institution of this size and stage. It is not a promise and not a benchmark. Full rule in the methodology.
Scored categories
- Internal Governance
- ESG & Non-Financial Reporting
- Operational Risk
- Third-Party / Supply Chain Risk
- Cybersecurity
- SOC 2 (Trust Services)
- Financial Regulation
- International Frameworks
- Privacy & Data Protection
- Ongoing / Scheduled
- HR & People Risk